Insularity is the main cause of conflict among humans

Claim:
Insularity is the main cause of conflict among humans.

Grounds:

Insularity is can be reffered as the custom of perfomring the act of singularity. It is believing that only you are the right one and exude ignorance upon the culture, ideas, and people out of one's comfort zone. If you dogmatize your own beliefs you are less likely to put other's opnion into consideration. A generation gap is a very fine example of isularity. You too must have experienced at least an event of a dispute with the person different than your age group. This is because you both will be practicing biasness towards your own generational values and are rigid about it. A conflict is inevitable and finally one has to loosen up to put the conflict to an end. It is clear from this example that insularity is the main reason behind the conflict.

Warrants:

Dogmatizing your values will make you narrow-minded. One will not consider the ideas or culture of the other and always tries to put their ideas through. Well, every human living on this earth wants to have things work the way they want. A thousand heads will have thousand ideas inspiredfrom thousand cultures. One's comfort can be other's discomfort. Every one of them has a mouth to express their feels and if that does not go through then they resort to adrenaline and finally a fight breaks. The world war 2 was the reason for insularity of Germans, Japanese and the Americans. 

Backing:

Insularity may not be the reason for conflict every time. We strongly believe all Nepalese are brothers in our culture which prevented the country from being colonized by Britain. The strong belief in this value forced people to come together irrespective of their race, age or gender which resulted in protection of the nation's dignity.

Rebuttal: 

Insularity did stop a single country from being colonized but it was strong enough to break the biggest conflict which took lives of thousands, the first and second world war. Hence, insularity does more harm than good.

Comments